mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-06 19:01:54 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 4.7
59c221521c
Resolves CI swarm rc=69 ("msmtp: needs a password"): controller-side
Ansible lookups (lookup('email').password etc.) couldn't see the
tokens.yml that Mailu writes target-side, because the controller has
its own filesystem in swarm mode.
Mount NFS-shared /var/lib/infinito on every swarm host AND on the
controller during deploy (in-play delegate_to: localhost task at end
of svc-storage-nfs-server role). State subdir exported separately
with no_root_squash + wildcard CIDRs so root-owned writes succeed
and the controller can mount from outside the svc-swarm IP set.
Single-writer guarantee on FILE_TOKENS via delegate_to: STACK_HOST +
run_once on sys-token-store/{01_core,write}.yml. Backup roles
(svc-bkp-container-2-local, sys-ctl-cln-bkps, sys-ctl-cln-faild-bkps,
user-backup/03_permissions_folders, three direct callers of
04_seed-database-to-backup.yml) gated on IS_STACK_HOST to prevent
N-host write races on the shared NFS backup tree.
Fail-fast assertion in svc-storage-nfs-client + 05_controller_mount
when pre-existing local /var/lib/infinito would be hidden by mount-
over. Operator must migrate or wipe before re-deploying.
SPOTs: SWARM_LAB_NETWORK in workflow env block, storage.nfs.state_subdir
in group_vars/all/15_storage.yml, DIR_VAR_LIB unchanged. UPPER_CASE
constants in NFS roles. Cleanup script umounts controller view before
container teardown to prevent stale-mount leak between matrix jobs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Test Utilities 🧪
This directory holds the operational side of testing in Infinito.Nexus.
These assets are meant to support confidence, not ceremony. They help the project validate real-world behavior across local development, CI environments, and deployment-oriented smoke tests. The emphasis is on practical feedback: when something breaks, the surrounding test tooling should make the failure easier to understand, easier to reproduce, and easier to clean up. 🚀
Good changes in this area usually make the test experience more:
- repeatable
- diagnosable
- environment-aware
- safe to rerun
The ideal outcome is boring reliability: contributors should be able to trust that a test run says something meaningful about the system, not just about the machine that happened to execute it. ✅