Files
computer-playbook/docs/contributing/tools/github/actions/secrets.md
T
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5 71888d86af refactor(ci): prefix workflows by trigger
The workflow directory mixed entry points, reusable stages and scheduled jobs into one flat list sorted by topic, so the first question about any file - what starts it - was the one the name did not answer. Every workflow now carries one of three prefixes, derived from its on: block: cron- for a schedule trigger, call- for one only reachable through workflow_call, entry- for everything a repository event or a human starts. Scheduled workflows additionally carry an alarm clock as the first character of their name.

Two lints keep it that way. One derives the expected prefix from the triggers and compares it against the file name; it flagged all 17 offenders before the rename and none after. The other resolves every .github/workflows/<file> string in the repository against the directory, which is what a rename silently breaks in Markdown links, Python constants and shell API URLs alike.

Renaming pulled 69 pre-existing comments into the comment lint's changed-file scope. The vendored CodeQL template got the nocheck marker its scorecard sibling already carried, two workflow headers moved above name: where they count as file headers, and the remaining banners were deleted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 17:05:51 +02:00

6.0 KiB

CI Secrets 🔐

This page lists every repository secret that GitHub Actions workflows in this repository consume, and documents the failure mode when a secret is missing. For repository variables see configuration.md. For the workflow catalog see workflows.md.

Repository secrets MUST be set under Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions → Secrets.

Secrets 📋

Secret Workflow Purpose Required when
BOT_APP_CLIENT_ID cron-update.yml GitHub App Client ID (OAuth-style Iv… identifier shown on the App's General page) used to mint a short-lived installation token for the update PR. CI_ENABLE_AUTO_UPDATES == 'true'
BOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY cron-update.yml PEM-encoded private key of the same GitHub App. Used to sign the JWT that exchanges for the installation token. CI_ENABLE_AUTO_UPDATES == 'true'

BOT_APP_CLIENT_ID and BOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY 🤖

Why these secrets exist 🎯

Actions performed with the workflow-provided GITHUB_TOKEN do not start further workflow runs. When cron-update.yml opens an update PR with GITHUB_TOKEN, the pull_request and pull_request_target events that drive entry-pr-change-orchestrate.yml do not fire on that PR, so the CI orchestrator never runs against it.

Opening the PR through a GitHub App installation token bypasses this restriction. The App counts as a distinct actor, so PR-lifecycle events fire normally and the full CI pipeline runs against every update PR.

Why a GitHub App and not a PAT 🏷️

A GitHub App installation token SHOULD be used because:

  • The token lifetime is bounded to one hour, and a new token is minted on every workflow run.
  • Permissions are scoped at the App installation level, independent of any user account.
  • No personal account footprint appears in audit logs.

A classic personal access token MAY be used as a fallback for unrelated automation, but it MUST NOT be used here because user-bound credentials expand the blast radius and require manual rotation.

How to generate the App 🛠️

  1. Create a new GitHub App under Organization settings → Developer settings → GitHub Apps → New GitHub App.
  2. Disable the webhook (uncheck Active under Webhook). The App MUST NOT receive events.
  3. Grant the following repository permissions and nothing else:
    • Contents: Read and write (the update script force-pushes to update/* branches).
    • Pull requests: Read and write (gh pr create / gh pr edit).
    • Metadata: Read (default, cannot be removed).
  4. Restrict installation to the owning account only.
  5. Generate a private key and download the PEM file.
  6. Install the App on the core repository only. The App MUST NOT be installed on unrelated repositories.

How to hand the credentials to CI 📥

  1. Open the repository on GitHub.
  2. Go to Settings → Secrets and variables → Actions.
  3. Stay on the Secrets tab.
  4. Click New repository secret and add BOT_APP_CLIENT_ID with the App's Client ID (shown on the App's General page under About, in the Iv… format — not the numeric App ID).
  5. Click New repository secret and add BOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY with the complete PEM content, including the -----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- and -----END PRIVATE KEY----- lines.

How the workflow consumes the secrets ⚙️

Each PR-opening job in cron-update.yml runs an actions/create-github-app-token@v2 step gated on steps.diff.outputs.changed == 'true', then forwards the minted token as GH_TOKEN and the resolved APP_SLUG to the subsequent PR step. The job's permissions: block keeps the workflow-provided GITHUB_TOKEN read-only; write access is provided exclusively by the App token, scoped to the App's repository permissions.

Commit identity propagation 🪪

pr.sh reads APP_SLUG from the environment and resolves the App's bot user via gh api /users/<slug>[bot]. The resolved login and numeric user ID are written into git config user.name and git config user.email in the <id>+<slug>[bot]@users.noreply.github.com form that GitHub accepts for verified commits. When APP_SLUG is unset, the script falls back to the github-actions[bot] identity. That branch is reached only when the script is invoked outside the workflow, for example a local smoke test where the caller has set GH_TOKEN to something other than an App token.

Failure mode when secrets are missing 💥

A missing secret resolves to an empty string in workflow expressions. The workflow run starts and proceeds normally until the token-minting step:

Stage Behaviour when both secrets are missing
Workflow parse Run starts. GitHub emits the warning The following secrets are referenced but not defined: BOT_APP_CLIENT_ID, BOT_APP_PRIVATE_KEY.
Generate app token step actions/create-github-app-token declares both inputs as required and fails with Error: Input required and not supplied: client-id.
Open PR if … changed step Skipped. Its implicit if: condition is success() && (steps.diff.outputs.changed == 'true'), and success() is false after the token step failed.
pr.sh Not executed. No commit, no push, no PR.
Outcome The run is marked failed. GitHub notifies repository admins. No PR is created with a wrong identity.

The behaviour is fail-loud by design. Missing or mistyped secret names MUST surface as a failed workflow run rather than as a PR with an unintended author.