Files
computer-playbook/scripts/tests
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 4.7 e0ef4dcc98 fix(env-test): discover compose network for DiD probe instead of hardcoding it
probe_did_inner_build() in scripts/tests/environment/utils/cache.sh
hardcoded the compose network as `infinito-nexus_default`. Compose
derives the network name from the project name, which defaults to the
host CWD basename — `infinito-nexus` locally, `infinito-nexus-core` in
the CI fork, something else again in Act runners and worktrees. CI
therefore failed the test-environment matrix on every distro with
`network infinito-nexus_default not found` even though the cache
stack itself was healthy.

Look up the network the running `infinito-package-cache-frontend`
container is actually attached to via `docker inspect` and use that.
Fail loudly if discovery returns empty rather than silently skipping
the probe.

Verified via `make act-workflow ACT_WORKFLOW=.github/workflows/test-environment.yml ACT_JOB=test-environment ACT_MATRIX='dev_runtime_image:debian:bookworm'` — Job succeeded, probe step reports `[OK] DiD inner-build flowed through cache frontend`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 08:05:28 +02:00
..

Test Utilities 🧪

This directory holds the operational side of testing in Infinito.Nexus.

These assets are meant to support confidence, not ceremony. They help the project validate real-world behavior across local development, CI environments, and deployment-oriented smoke tests. The emphasis is on practical feedback: when something breaks, the surrounding test tooling should make the failure easier to understand, easier to reproduce, and easier to clean up. 🚀

Good changes in this area usually make the test experience more:

  • repeatable
  • diagnosable
  • environment-aware
  • safe to rerun

The ideal outcome is boring reliability: contributors should be able to trust that a test run says something meaningful about the system, not just about the machine that happened to execute it. ✅