mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-08 19:56:53 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
d4be869198
The routing probe cross-checks usage.prompt_tokens against what it sent, because that is the one number in the exchange the backend produced rather than this deployment declared. A mock route answers from mock_response and never reads the prompt, and litellm sets usage unconditionally from DEFAULT_MOCK_RESPONSE_PROMPT_TOKEN_COUNT, which is 10 in the pinned main-v1.77.7-stable. Every mock answer therefore reported 10 of 8192 and failed as a silent truncation, which is what run 36064589578 hit in both litellm rows. The exemption sits after the declared-window check, so a mock routed a prompt its own window cannot hold is still a routing failure; only the truncation number is dropped. MOCK_ALIASES comes from AI_MOCK_ALIASES rather than a second derivation of the same list. Pinned by three cases, including the placement: moving the exemption above the window check makes test_a_mock_is_still_held_to_its_declared_window fail. The reason string of a neighbouring case claimed the opposite of what the pinned image does and is corrected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>