Files
computer-playbook/scripts/tests
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5 ce2bdec6f0 fix(swarm-drill): stop the backup timers before the drill goes destructive
The DR drill starts the backup units itself, but the deploy arms their calendar
timers first, and a job that runs long enough crosses every backup window in
group_vars/all/07_schedule.yml. web-app-decidim ran 23:05-02:24 and hit exactly
that: the drill's own volume backup succeeded at 01:00:49, then the timer fired
a second, unattended run at 01:03:18 while step [8b/9] was lazily unmounting
/var/lib/infinito underneath it.

The failure is silent by construction. baudolo writes the dump in two
processes - 'pg_dump > x.tmp', then 'mv x.tmp x'. The redirect shell exits 0
because a shell never reports a failed writeback on a soft NFS mount, but the
unmount discarded that mount instance together with the unflushed file, so the
mv resolved through the fresh instance and got ENOENT. The unit died at
01:04:04, the same second the drill finished remounting, and 80 minutes later
the CLI test read 'failed' and aborted the job before running its own backup.

Disarming the timers makes the drill the only thing driving those units.
Stopping a timer does not stop its service, and both the drill and
roles/svc-bkp-volume-2-local/files/test/test.sh start their units explicitly,
so nothing under test loses coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 16:55:17 +02:00
..
…

Test Utilities 🧪

This directory holds the operational side of testing in Infinito.Nexus.

These assets are meant to support confidence, not ceremony. They help the project validate real-world behavior across local development, CI environments, and deployment-oriented smoke tests. The emphasis is on practical feedback: when something breaks, the surrounding test tooling should make the failure easier to understand, easier to reproduce, and easier to clean up. 🚀

Good changes in this area usually make the test experience more:

  • repeatable
  • diagnosable
  • environment-aware
  • safe to rerun

The ideal outcome is boring reliability: contributors should be able to trust that a test run says something meaningful about the system, not just about the machine that happened to execute it. ✅