Files
computer-playbook/docs
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5 fbb68ed0f4 docs(036): file the three candidates on what the running instances offer
Criterion 1 asks for each unverified candidate to be probed against a running
instance and filed with its reason. Replace the vendor-documentation claim
with what was measured:

- baserow 2.3.3 reads settings.BASEROW_OPENAI_BASE_URL in
  generative_ai_model_types.py:271, so the AI field takes a custom
  OpenAI-compatible base URL. Confirmed.
- homeassistant 2026.7 has no base_url in openai_conversation's config flow
  (0 matches). Its only configurable local path is the separate ollama
  integration, whose config flow carries CONF_URL (7 matches) but speaks
  Ollama's native API rather than the gateway's OpenAI-compatible surface.
  Excluded.
- xwiki carries no AI or LLM extension in the pinned image's extension
  repository. Left open rather than excluded: the extension is an installable
  first-party one, like mediawiki's AIEditingAssistant, so excluding it would
  be scope reduction.

Also correct the backend-role rationale. The text claimed .running is right
because group_names is per host and the two agree on a single-host round.
They do not once apps= is set: backends arrive as dependencies, so both
branches missed and the gateway answered every prompt with
`Invalid model name passed in model=openrouter/auto`.

No checkbox is ticked: criterion 1 wants every candidate filed, and xwiki is
still open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 12:43:39 +02:00
..
…

Documentation 📝

This directory contains the repository documentation published for Infinito.Nexus. Its scope is contributor guidance, agent instructions, operational guides, requirements, and security guidance across the project.