mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-09 20:26:33 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
cb1ff29951
clone and covered_by both name a stand-in row: another row carries this one's coverage, so the sweep may drop it. Both were decided over every row and then applied to a filtered set, so a run that selected a subset deferred to a stand-in the filter had already removed - the row was cut in favour of a deploy that never happens. --whitelist svc-db-mariadb yielded no row at all, and the swarm-zombie job passed green while drilling nothing. The sort's last-resort tie-breaker was drawn per process, so discovery and the plan renderer could name different assignments for the same run. INFINITO_DISCOVERY_SEED derives it from the row's own identity instead; the workflow feeds github.run_id, so the rotation still happens, once per run rather than once per process. Measured against the previous order: on the mode-only filter both cut sets are identical (swarm 220 rows, 44 cut; compose 243 rows, 54 cut), so the full sweep is unaffected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>