mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-06 19:01:54 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
8434a31611
Rows are indexed by `(name, variant)` and a variant is an int. A token that
names only a role carries no variant, so the lookup ran with `None` and could
never hit, and every such token was reported as matching no discovered row.
That is the form `collapse_to_roles` produces, so it is the form a retriggered
priority line arrives in. Run 34348821577 shows the result: all twenty-one
priority entries carried
priority: '<role>' matches no discovered row
(no row in this run's mode and lifecycle envelope)
while baserow, checkmk, decidim and the rest went on to deploy fine. The
warning was not wrong about one entry and right about twenty; it was blind. A
role that genuinely has no row in the envelope looked exactly like a role with a
full set, which is how priority work goes missing without anyone being able to
see which entry did.
A token that narrows nothing beyond the role name is now answered by existence:
it asks for the role in whatever axes the rotation picks, so any discovered row
satisfies it. `Pin.pinned` already draws that line - "whether the token narrows
anything at all beyond the role name" - and pinned tokens keep the old path,
`check_pins` included.
Three tests come with it. There was already one for a bare role that matches
nothing, and none for a bare role that matches something, which is why the
lookup could stay broken. One of the new ones uses variant 4 so a future
implementation cannot pass by quietly guessing variant 0. Checked against HEAD:
the same input returns the spurious warning there, so the tests fail without
this change.
This restores the signal, not the lost jobs. The other silent path, `priority`
being truncated to the job budget in cli/meta/ci/chunks.py, is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>