kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5 07e8ce8da5 feat(web-app-docs): pull the replayed deploy through the GHCR mirror ...

The instruction replay provisions a fresh inventory inside a throwaway
target, so its compose pull fetched every application image from the
upstream registry while every other CI deploy pulls through the GHCR
mirror. On the moodle row of run 39082924588, 512 s of the 1646 s
ansible run went into that pull.

mirror.sh rewrites the extracted block and not the README template the
site publishes: it inserts the mirrors.yml resolver ahead of the
provision call and passes --mirror. A reader keeps the upstream
references, because a reader has no GHCR mirror to pull from, and the
replay exists to prove the instructions a reader copies. Outside CI the
two GitHub variables are empty and the block stays byte-identical.

The prefix is read from default.env in the checkout, the way machine.sh
already reads INFINITO_PARENT_IMAGE, so no Ansible template has to look
up an INFINITO_ key that belongs in an inventory.

A block that carries no provision call fails the harness instead of
quietly falling back to the upstream registry, and test_mirror.py
renders both published shapes to keep the two sed patterns matched to
what the template emits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-10-19 01:00:55 +02:00

..

__init__.py

…

test_extract.py

fix(web-app-docs): let the end-to-end round finish

2026-09-27 17:02:05 +02:00

test_mirror.py

feat(web-app-docs): pull the replayed deploy through the GHCR mirror

2026-10-19 01:00:55 +02:00