mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-08 19:56:53 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
78b557b354
`truncated` compared character counts against a flat 0.5 for every language. A logographic script carries a morpheme per character, so a complete Chinese rendering of an English passage runs at roughly a third of its length and the predicate read it as a dropped clause. Measured against the deployed LibreTranslate, re-translating 15 refused sources per language: zh 15 of 15 refused, ja 11 of 15, ko 10 of 15, while 44 of those 45 ended in terminal punctuation, so they were complete sentences. The ratios clustered between 0.28 and 0.55; a real truncation scatters and stops mid-sentence. 0.25 sits below every complete rendering measured and still catches a passage cut to a quarter. The language set is measured, not guessed: zh, ko and ja account for 5553 of the 6135 truncation refusals, 90.5%. The next language down is at 116, small enough to be genuine truncation, so it keeps the flat ratio. `collapsed` already reasons this way for the same reason, its docstring naming Chinese explicitly; `truncated` never got the same treatment. `reason` already carried the language for `untranslated` and now passes it on. Effect on the catalogs, from the run rather than a test: zh 4153 truncation refusals to 20, ko 816 to 0, ja 584 to 0, and 5590 entries that had been stuck are now translated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>