mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-08 03:38:23 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
71888d86af
The workflow directory mixed entry points, reusable stages and scheduled jobs into one flat list sorted by topic, so the first question about any file - what starts it - was the one the name did not answer. Every workflow now carries one of three prefixes, derived from its on: block: cron- for a schedule trigger, call- for one only reachable through workflow_call, entry- for everything a repository event or a human starts. Scheduled workflows additionally carry an alarm clock as the first character of their name. Two lints keep it that way. One derives the expected prefix from the triggers and compares it against the file name; it flagged all 17 offenders before the rename and none after. The other resolves every .github/workflows/<file> string in the repository against the directory, which is what a rename silently breaks in Markdown links, Python constants and shell API URLs alike. Renaming pulled 69 pre-existing comments into the comment lint's changed-file scope. The vendored CodeQL template got the nocheck marker its scorecard sibling already carried, two workflow headers moved above name: where they count as file headers, and the remaining banners were deleted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Test Utilities 🧪
This directory holds the operational side of testing in Infinito.Nexus.
These assets are meant to support confidence, not ceremony. They help the project validate real-world behavior across local development, CI environments, and deployment-oriented smoke tests. The emphasis is on practical feedback: when something breaks, the surrounding test tooling should make the failure easier to understand, easier to reproduce, and easier to clean up. 🚀
Good changes in this area usually make the test experience more:
- repeatable
- diagnosable
- environment-aware
- safe to rerun
The ideal outcome is boring reliability: contributors should be able to trust that a test run says something meaningful about the system, not just about the machine that happened to execute it. ✅