mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-06 10:59:59 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
6f5b085e72
Every one of the eleven declared tools carried the placeholder schema
{"properties": {}, "type": "object"}. The adapter answers tools/list purely
from this contract, so each client saw parameterless tools: nothing could know
that read_post needs a post_id, and the call failed upstream instead of being
formed correctly. The schemas here were measured against the running upstream;
list_agents keeps an empty property set because upstream declares none.
Both pins of the file follow, as the adapter rehashes the contract at startup.
Add a lint binding the declared surface to the shipped one. Only the allowlist
is an equality: writer_allowlist is a superset by construction, because
passthrough.py rejects a whole contract as soon as one tool declares
mutating: true while mutations are off, and upstream_serves is an observation
that may legitimately exceed what the platform allows.
The suppression lookup both MCP lints need moves into suppress.py rather than
being written twice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>