mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-06 19:01:54 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5
ab2062da2a
The body was a Jinja-interpolated shell string inside the task. As a file it
can be read, shellchecked and run, and the three parameters travel through the
environment the way the password already did.
That forces one thing into the open. The old expression carried
${PATCH_PASSWORD} and the shell expanded it while assembling the command; a
value arriving in an environment variable is not expanded a second time, so the
substitution has to be explicit. The consumers now write @PASSWORD@ and the
script replaces it, which is also the version a reader can follow without
knowing that rule.
The script refuses to run without its parameters rather than treating an unset
one as empty, because an empty volume name would look exactly like a node that
does not hold the volume: a silent success on every host.
Tests move with it, to the files/ segment every other test of a shipped script
uses. They run it against a stubbed `container` in three states per consumer -
no volume, volume without the config, both present - and assert the marker the
task reads as a change. Five mutations of the script were checked against them:
dropping the substitution, the marker, the existence test, the parameter guards
and the volume filter each turn the suite red.
Layout follows what the linters already require: files/shell/ is enforced by
role-files-layout, and 65e34746fc names ansible.builtin.script as the sanctioned
way to run one from a task.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4 lines
83 B
Python
4 lines
83 B
Python
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
PROJECT_ROOT: Path = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[5]
|