mirror of
https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/computer-playbook.git
synced 2026-11-06 02:54:26 +00:00
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 4.7
aa23cba583
The credentials baker at cli/administration/inventory/credentials/__main__.py
walked `schema_creds.items()` one level deep and called `str(value)` on
every leaf. For nested credential groups like
``credentials.recaptcha = {key, secret}`` (declared in
roles/web-app-espocrm/meta/schema.yml and
roles/web-app-listmonk/meta/schema.yml) this collapsed the inner dict
into its Python repr, vault-encrypted that blob, and wrote it as a
single scalar at ``credentials.recaptcha``. The runtime ``config``
lookup then choked on the descent into ``recaptcha.key``:
The lookup plugin 'config' failed: Expected dict for 'key', got
_AnsibleTaggedStr at 'key'
Full path so far: applications['web-app-espocrm'].credentials.recaptcha.key
Current object: "{'key': '{{ CAPTCHA.RECAPTCHA.KEY }}', 'secret':
'{{ CAPTCHA.RECAPTCHA.SECRET }}'}"
(jobs 77797371397 espocrm and 77797371442 listmonk on run 26428080957.)
Introduce ``emit_credentials`` (new module: ``credentials/emit.py``)
that walks the schema recursively. Scalar leaves still vault-encrypt
via ``to_vault_block``; dict nodes recurse into a nested CommentedMap
via ``ensure_map``. The walker also tracks dotted full-key paths so
the existing ``--force``-mode override-apply logic sees the same dotted
keys it always saw.
Auto-healing for previously-corrupted host_vars: ``ensure_map``
overwrites non-CommentedMap placeholders, so the next bake replaces a
stringified ``credentials.recaptcha`` blob with the correct nested
structure. Operators with corrupted entries simply re-run the
credentials generator; no manual cleanup needed.
Package refactor (KISS/DRY/SPOT):
The 450+ LoC ``__main__.py`` was carrying four orthogonal concerns
(vault, --set parsing, recursive emission, prompts) plus orchestration.
Split by concern:
- ``credentials/vault.py``: ``is_vault_encrypted``,
``is_ruamel_vault``, ``to_vault_block`` (+ private helpers
``_vault_body``, ``_make_vault_scalar_from_text``).
- ``credentials/overrides.py``: ``parse_overrides``, ``override_for``.
- ``credentials/emit.py``: ``ensure_map``, ``emit_credentials``.
- ``credentials/prompts.py``: ``ask_for_confirmation``.
- ``credentials/__main__.py``: argparse + ``main`` + two thin mode
handlers (``_run_snippet_mode``, ``_run_default_mode``) + the
force-override helper.
``credentials/__init__.py`` re-exports the public API
(``main``, ``ask_for_confirmation``, ``parse_overrides``, etc.) so
external callers (notably ``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/
test_credentials.py``) keep working unchanged.
Test layout follows the split:
- ``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/credentials/test_vault.py``
(20 tests: vault detection, body extraction, scalar construction,
to_vault_block paths, plus the VaultHandler subprocess coverage).
- ``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/credentials/test_overrides.py``
(13 tests: parse_overrides + override_for incl. dotted nested keys).
- ``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/credentials/test_emit.py``
(10 tests: ensure_map placeholder replacement, recursive emission,
none → empty, skip_existing semantics, override precedence,
dotted-path tracking, the on-disk corruption recovery case).
- ``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/credentials/test_prompts.py``
(5 tests: ask_for_confirmation yes/no/garbage/case/whitespace).
``tests/unit/cli/administration/inventory/test_credentials.py`` keeps
only the end-to-end ``main()`` integration coverage (including
``test_nested_credentials_dict_recurses_instead_of_stringifying`` —
the explicit regression guard for the original failure mode).
Coverage: 47 new per-module unit tests + the 5 existing main()
integration tests, all green. ``make test`` green across all five
targets.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
14 lines
393 B
Python
14 lines
393 B
Python
"""Interactive operator prompts for the credentials CLI."""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
def ask_for_confirmation(key: str) -> bool:
|
|
"""Prompt the user for confirmation to overwrite an existing value."""
|
|
confirmation = (
|
|
input(f"Are you sure you want to overwrite the value for '{key}'? (y/n): ")
|
|
.strip()
|
|
.lower()
|
|
)
|
|
return confirmation == "y"
|