Of the 76 open code scanning alerts, 39 point at code that can change.
svc-ai-mcp-adapter:
- A path argument that is empty or made only of dots is refused.
Percent-encoding keeps a separator inside its segment, but "." and ".."
need none, so an upstream that resolves dot segments could answer from a
path the contract does not name.
- parse_duration splits on the units. The pattern it used before rescanned
a long run of digits from every start position.
Tests and the README generators:
- Every Jinja environment built with autoescape=False and a "noqa: S701"
uses select_autoescape now, as six test modules and
utils/templating/jinja.py already did. It escapes templates named
*.html, *.htm and *.xml, which none of these call sites loads.
- Dead code goes: a doubled "rel" block in the email lint, an unread
_SKIP_DIRS, and a module that _resolve returned to no caller.
- Two "except ...: pass" blocks become contextlib.suppress and
assertRaises.
- Nine test modules import unittest.mock one way instead of two, and one
lookup test imports its module once.
Closes#807
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both template tests listed the filters they hand to jinja by name, which made
the FilterModule a second source: adding a filter to it left these two behind,
and the templates that used it failed to compile with "No filter named …" in
test-unit and test-integration at once. The list is derived from the module now,
so a filter reaches the tests the moment the role can use it.
The two entries that are not filters at all, to_json and bool, stay spelled out
because jinja needs them and the module does not ship them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hermes and OpenClaw wrapped the tool allowlist in a guard that dropped the key when the callable set was empty. Both upstreams read an absent filter as "register every tool the server serves", so a provider resolving to no tools got the widest surface instead of none. Nextcloud keeps its contract in tools.categories with no allowlist and admits both clients, so it was the live case.
The templates now render the filter unconditionally, the way the n8n client node already pins include to selected; the two tests that asserted the omission are inverted. mcp_servers additionally rejects such a provider with the fatal code tools_unenforceable: a client filters by tool name, so a runtime-composed surface reaches it as no surface at all, and a server the agent can never call is worse wired in than refused with a reason.
A deployment pairing Nextcloud with either agent now aborts naming the provider, where it previously handed the agent every Context Agent tool unfiltered.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The provider block ec736bd4d7 added carries only an id per model. OpenClaw
validates the whole file before serving anything and rejected it:
Gateway failed to start: Invalid config at /home/node/.openclaw/openclaw.json:
models.providers.litellm.models.0.name: Invalid input
A rejected config is not a degraded start. The gateway retries, trips its own
breaker after four unclean boots, and the container ends at exit 128. The
deploy notices only at the very end, when the container health check gives up
after 25 attempts - twenty-five minutes and a role away from the cause.
The model itself was fine: the rendered file on the host held
[{"id": "qwen2.5:0.5b"}], so this is the missing key and not the
LITELLM_CHAT_MODEL fallback. name now sits beside id with the same value.
Which of the two reaches the API is the upstream's business; identical values
cannot send a different model than the one agents.defaults names.
It shipped because nothing rendered it. All three existing cases in
test_mcp_tool_filter.py pass OPENCLAW_LITELLM_ENABLED=False, so the block was
skipped and its shape was never compared to anything. The new test renders it
with LiteLLM on, and against the old template it fails on KeyError: 'name'.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both agents registered every tool every provider served. Hermes documents that as its own default in tools/mcp_tool.py, "Neither set -> register all tools", and the role never set tools.include; OpenClaw's toolFilter was never rendered at all. A provider that grew a mutating tool would have reached both without anything declaring it.
A serving role now names its mutating tools, the discovery snapshot carries that set beside the allowlist, and every client renders the allowlist minus it in whatever form its upstream enforces. The subtraction sits at the client and not in discovery because Flowise compares the declared set against what its registry actually discovered and needs the full served list. Where a provider permits mutations there is nothing to withhold, so the set renders empty.
This is a client-side boundary, not a server-side one: whoever holds the endpoint key can still call a write tool directly. Baserow is the case that made it necessary, since its MCPEndpoint model carries no scope and its owner is a workspace administrator, so the declared mutating_tools_enabled bounds nothing there.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5.5