The workflows pin `runs-on: ubuntu-NN.NN`, so no job moves to a new Ubuntu
release behind our back, but nothing raised the pin either. A sixth job of
`🔄 Update versions` closes that: `utils/update/runner.py` reads the image
table of actions/runner-images, takes the newest x64 Ubuntu label whose
image carries no preview or beta badge, and raises every older bare
`runs-on: ubuntu-NN.NN` to it; arch-suffixed labels stay untouched. The job
opens the change as one PR over `.github/workflows`, so its CI run tests
the new image before it reaches main.
This commit carries the updater's first result: every job now runs on
ubuntu-26.04 (49 `runs-on`).
actionlint 1.7.12, the newest release, does not know `ubuntu-26.04` yet
(rhysd/actionlint#682, fix proposed in rhysd/actionlint#743), so
`.github/actionlint.yaml` declares the label until a release knows it.
act maps each `ubuntu-NN.NN` label the workflows use to the local platform
image, derived from `.github/workflows`, instead of a fixed list that did
not know ubuntu-26.04.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`ubuntu-latest` moved from ubuntu-24.04 to ubuntu-26.04 on its own
schedule, in the middle of run 39166850273, and every job that landed on
the new image met a different OS: sudo-rs instead of sudo, no ip_tables
loaded, and now the NFS probe-write of svc-storage-nfs-client failing on
26.04 swarm nodes. The same branch went red without a code change.
Every `runs-on` now names `ubuntu-24.04`. GitHub still rebuilds that image
weekly, so patches and tool updates keep arriving; only the release jump
becomes a deliberate change of the label. The CodeQL job drops its dead
swift/macos-latest branch, since no swift language is in its matrix. act
already maps ubuntu-24.04 to the local platform image.
A lint rejects any job whose `runs-on` contains a `*-latest` label.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every scheduled workflow opened with an alarm clock, so the Actions list
read as a column of identical icons that said nothing about the run. The
clock now lives in run-name behind github.event_name == 'schedule', where
it marks the one thing it can mark: a run nobody triggered. The name says
what the run does, in two or three words.
The dispatch menu shows names in one narrow column and truncates them, so
a new lint caps a workflow_dispatch name at 25 characters and points the
longer, explanatory wording at run-name, which carries no such limit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every write scope sat at workflow level, so it reached each job in the file: entry-push-latest handed contents, packages, actions, security-events and issues write to all eight of its jobs, and call-orchestrator to all twenty-four, including every deploy and test job of the 134-job runs. The scopes now sit on the jobs that push, release or upload SARIF.
call-test-workspace, -install-make and -install-pkgmgr declared actions: write with no consumer at all, while passing the raw GITHUB_TOKEN into containers that start from mutable public tags and mount the docker socket. cron-cleanup-stale gave packages: write over the whole namespace to two jobs running third-party JavaScript that never touch a registry.
Eight single-job workflows are deliberately left alone: their one job needs the scope, so moving it produces an identical effective token while risking a job block that silently replaces contents: read. A check across every uses: edge confirms no callee now declares more than its caller grants.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The workflow directory mixed entry points, reusable stages and scheduled jobs into one flat list sorted by topic, so the first question about any file - what starts it - was the one the name did not answer. Every workflow now carries one of three prefixes, derived from its on: block: cron- for a schedule trigger, call- for one only reachable through workflow_call, entry- for everything a repository event or a human starts. Scheduled workflows additionally carry an alarm clock as the first character of their name.
Two lints keep it that way. One derives the expected prefix from the triggers and compares it against the file name; it flagged all 17 offenders before the rename and none after. The other resolves every .github/workflows/<file> string in the repository against the directory, which is what a rename silently breaks in Markdown links, Python constants and shell API URLs alike.
Renaming pulled 69 pre-existing comments into the comment lint's changed-file scope. The vendored CodeQL template got the nocheck marker its scorecard sibling already carried, two workflow headers moved above name: where they count as file headers, and the remaining banners were deleted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5.5