Of the 76 open code scanning alerts, 39 point at code that can change.
svc-ai-mcp-adapter:
- A path argument that is empty or made only of dots is refused.
Percent-encoding keeps a separator inside its segment, but "." and ".."
need none, so an upstream that resolves dot segments could answer from a
path the contract does not name.
- parse_duration splits on the units. The pattern it used before rescanned
a long run of digits from every start position.
Tests and the README generators:
- Every Jinja environment built with autoescape=False and a "noqa: S701"
uses select_autoescape now, as six test modules and
utils/templating/jinja.py already did. It escapes templates named
*.html, *.htm and *.xml, which none of these call sites loads.
- Dead code goes: a doubled "rel" block in the email lint, an unread
_SKIP_DIRS, and a module that _resolve returned to no caller.
- Two "except ...: pass" blocks become contextlib.suppress and
assertRaises.
- Nine test modules import unittest.mock one way instead of two, and one
lookup test imports its module once.
Closes#807
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Review had these removed across the role once already, and the 11 September
pass cleared every file that was flagged. The seal-key pin and the
recovery-key work then reintroduced the same pattern in nine new places.
Also removes two that predate the review and were never flagged: the
healthcheck note in meta/services.yml and the entrypoint note in
compose.yml.j2. Both are the same narrative-exception shape.
Param docs, file headers and the plain contract notes in the Playwright specs
stay: separate categories, none of them objected to. What the deleted
comments recorded lives in the role README.
Six assertions: the key is persisted on the deploy that creates it, it is
loaded before the logins that may need it, recovery is gated on both logins
having failed and a key existing, the rebuilt AppRole is the inventory one
rather than the recorded one, the recovery path ends by re-pinning, and a
rejected key fails loudly.
Recovering to the recorded pair instead of the inventory pair would strand
the next deploy the same way, which is why that one is asserted directly.
Nothing stopped the seal key drifting back into the per-deploy rotation, and
the regression is invisible until a deploy is skipped and the node cannot
unseal. Assert the pin on the seal key and its absence on both AppRole
credentials.
lint-python runs ruff, which the pytest lint suite does not cover, so these
slipped through locally: an unnecessary lambda around bool, and a Jinja
Environment left on the implicit autoescape default. The suppression has to sit
on the autoescape argument itself, which is where ruff anchors the violation.
Every one of these breaks into something that looks like ordinary drift rather
than a defect: a state read moved after the backend include leaves the node
sealed, a token helper fed the first login's stdout gets an empty string on
every rotated deploy and fails later at the first write, an ungated SecretID
swap answers 500 on every deploy that did not rotate, and a swap that never
destroys the old SecretID revokes nothing at all.
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5.5
evangelostsak