LAM is not served at APP_BASE_URL: / redirects to /lam/, whose body is a
bare meta refresh to templates/login.php, and /login, /admin/ and /admin
all 404 at the vhost root. The shared helper samples for a password field
on that interstitial and never reaches the form -- CI traces show no form
submission at all and LAM's access log records no POST.
Behind that, LAM binds the DN from its Admins list with
LDAP.BIND_CREDENTIAL while the helper types the users.administrator
secret of a different directory entry. That half is configurable via
ADMIN_NATIVE_PASSWORD; the entry point is not, so the opt-out stands and
the README records both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 21 env templates added two commits ago left the persona flags off entirely
in most roles. biber.js has no native-login branch at all -- with
SSO_SERVICE_ENABLED false it never authenticates and then hard-fails at :201
rather than skipping -- and admin.js gates its native fallback on !oidcEnabled.
CI deploys every matrix variant, and variant 1 of these roles pins
services.sso.enabled false, so each of them was a guaranteed red job that had
never been observed because the specs had never run.
Nine flags are static true: chess, confluence and jira pin sso.enabled false in
meta/services.yml with no variant override and provision no native admin, so
there is no login surface in any variant. Eleven follow services.sso.enabled in
the ternary web-app-baserow already uses, for the roles that do have an
SSO-enabled variant where the personas should run. pgadmin and phpldapadmin
lose the credential keys that a permanently blocked persona can never read.
Eleven nocheck rationales cited "the sys-svc-mail integration tests" as the
coverage that justifies not gating on EMAIL_SERVICE_ENABLED. No such tests
exist: roles/sys-svc-mail* contain no tests at all, and
tests/integration/infrastructure/services/test_mailu_dependency.py is a static
YAML parity check. The real delivery coverage is web-app-mailu's own spec,
playwright.spec.js:154. Each is now a fact checkable inside its own role.
Eight more claimed the CSS injector's origin is asserted by the shared CSP
baseline. personas/utils/csp.js:96 bails with `if (!host) continue`, and
injectorBaseUrl("css") reads CSS_BASE_URL, which no consumer role renders --
so the assertion is a guaranteed no-op everywhere. Rewritten to the
mechanically true reason: assertCspInjections resolves the injector through a
computed loop variable, never a literal gate argument, so test_spec_env_gates'
literal-only regex cannot see it.
The CSP hole itself is left standing: rendering CSS_BASE_URL would arm the
injection assertion for every consumer role at once, which is a change of a
different size than correcting a comment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
test_has_spec.py forces every roles/web-app-* to ship a Playwright spec and
calls a missing one a hard error, because the persona contract must never be
silently absent from the deploy capstone. Nothing forced the other half. The
runner discovers roles by rglob('templates/playwright.env.j2')
(discover_playwright_roles.py:53), so a spec without that file is staged
nowhere and executed never.
21 of 76 web-app roles were in exactly that state. Verified rather than
inferred: running the discovery filter directly returns 61 roles and none of
the 21 is among them, `make compose-playwright` refuses without a rendered
.env from a prior deploy, and `git log --all` on those paths shows the file
never existed on any branch -- the single hit is web-app-gitlab on a fork
branch. Their specs have never run once. 15 of the 21 deploy in CI today,
reporting green while their only functional verification never fires.
The new lint mirrors test_has_spec and carries a per-role opt-out that is
used nowhere: uniform beats exceptions.
Every one of the 21 now has a template written against its own
meta/services.yml rather than a shared skeleton -- espocrm splits
ADMIN_PASSWORD from ADMIN_NATIVE_PASSWORD because OIDC_ALLOW_ADMIN_USER
leaves both login paths open, the four permanently auth-less roles declare
their personas blocked instead of shipping a knowingly-red spec, and
web-app-mastodon gained a real test-seaweedfs.js because no honest
suppression existed for a role that does route Paperclip to S3.
web-app-magento moves pre-alpha -> alpha here: it now has a spec that runs,
which is what the lifecycle gate is about.
Six meta/services.yml files change only where adding a template falsified an
existing suppression -- gitlab and shopware both claimed the role 'ships no
templates/playwright.env.j2', which stopped being true in this commit.
Not resolved here, and the adversarial review says so plainly: the specs are
enabled, not proven. None has executed against a live stack. The review found
three classes of defect that land in follow-up commits rather than being
smuggled in silently -- persona blocks that are missing or should be tied to
sso.enabled, eleven suppressions naming a sys-svc-mail test suite that does
not exist, and eight claiming a CSP assertion that cannot fire because no
consumer role renders CSS_BASE_URL.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5