The workflows pin `runs-on: ubuntu-NN.NN`, so no job moves to a new Ubuntu
release behind our back, but nothing raised the pin either. A sixth job of
`🔄 Update versions` closes that: `utils/update/runner.py` reads the image
table of actions/runner-images, takes the newest x64 Ubuntu label whose
image carries no preview or beta badge, and raises every older bare
`runs-on: ubuntu-NN.NN` to it; arch-suffixed labels stay untouched. The job
opens the change as one PR over `.github/workflows`, so its CI run tests
the new image before it reaches main.
This commit carries the updater's first result: every job now runs on
ubuntu-26.04 (49 `runs-on`).
actionlint 1.7.12, the newest release, does not know `ubuntu-26.04` yet
(rhysd/actionlint#682, fix proposed in rhysd/actionlint#743), so
`.github/actionlint.yaml` declares the label until a release knows it.
act maps each `ubuntu-NN.NN` label the workflows use to the local platform
image, derived from `.github/workflows`, instead of a fixed list that did
not know ubuntu-26.04.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`ubuntu-latest` moved from ubuntu-24.04 to ubuntu-26.04 on its own
schedule, in the middle of run 39166850273, and every job that landed on
the new image met a different OS: sudo-rs instead of sudo, no ip_tables
loaded, and now the NFS probe-write of svc-storage-nfs-client failing on
26.04 swarm nodes. The same branch went red without a code change.
Every `runs-on` now names `ubuntu-24.04`. GitHub still rebuilds that image
weekly, so patches and tool updates keep arriving; only the release jump
becomes a deliberate change of the label. The CodeQL job drops its dead
swift/macos-latest branch, since no swift language is in its matrix. act
already maps ubuntu-24.04 to the local platform image.
A lint rejects any job whose `runs-on` contains a `*-latest` label.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The gate flagged six of my own changes. INFINITO_ANSIBLE_COLLECTIONS_SOURCE
reached default.env without a handler, so the generator dropped it
silently; ansible.sh then carried a shell-side default for the same key,
a second source that drifts. Both are now one declaration, read as
required, so a missing key fails loudly instead of falling back.
File reads route through the session cache except where the same run
rewrites the file, which is the documented opt-out and now says so per
call. The updater reads yaml through utils.cache.yaml rather than calling
safe_load itself.
restore_collection_history.sh was committed without its executable bit,
and the new workflow's name was 31 characters where the dispatch menu
truncates at 25; the explanatory wording lives in run-name instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Which of the two sources is faster is not a constant. galaxy.ansible.com
degraded from 207s to 687s over one day and then served 502s outright,
while the pinned git fallback carried the same install in 31s; a week
later the order may be the other way round. The daily job times both and
swaps the default only when the preferred one's median reaches three
times the other's over twelve samples.
A failed install is recorded as None and ranks worse than any duration,
so an outage counts instead of dropping out of the statistic. Below a
full window nothing changes, which keeps a single bad day from flipping
the default.
History lives in an artifact rather than the Actions cache: a schedule
run resolves to the default branch and has read-only cache access there,
so it could not carry the window forward.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kevinveenbirkenbachandClaude Opus 5.5